The Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) recently introduced a proposal for Ginnie Mae to develop a new mortgage securitization product aimed at increasing the availability of private capital liquidity sources in the market, especially during economic downturns in the U.S.
The association highlighted that Ginnie Mae’s new Home Equity Conversion Mortgage (HECM)-backed Securities (HMBS) product, known as “HMBS 2.0,” could serve as a model for this new initiative.
Proposal and Inspiration
The proposed Ginnie Mae [early buyout (EBO)] security would differ from traditional Ginnie Mae securities by not following a modified pass-through structure. Instead, it would resemble Ginnie Mae HMBS, where investors receive accrued sums when loans are resolved.
MBA’s president and CEO, Bob Broeksmit, emphasized that the EBO security could enhance liquidity for government servicing throughout economic cycles. Addressing timing mismatches within Ginnie Mae’s program, the EBO security aims to alleviate concerns shared by issuers and regulators.
Building on the success of HMBS 2.0, the proposal seeks to expand liquidity and resolve challenges faced by the reverse mortgage business, such as liquidity issues caused by bankruptcies and interest rate fluctuations.
The white paper outlined how Ginnie Mae’s HMBS program could serve as a logistical template for the EBO securitization product rollout, providing a blueprint for Ginnie Mae staff.
While acknowledging potential low investor demand, MBA believes that the proposed program could still have a significant impact, particularly in supporting the market during critical times.
Reverse Response: ‘You’re Welcome’
Joe Kelly from New View Advisors highlighted how the HECM/HMBS program has evolved into a model to emulate, reflecting on the success of HMBS 2.0. The proposed MBA program shares similar goals with HMBS 2.0 in providing liquidity for defaulted FHA-insured loans.
Although both programs share objectives, differences exist due to collateral variations. The white paper addresses the timing mismatch issue, particularly concerning defaulted loans, and emphasizes the need for a solution amidst increased reliance on independent mortgage banker participants.
As the mortgage finance system shifts towards relying more on independent mortgage banks and structured finance solutions, initiatives like HMBS 2.0 and the proposed program are becoming crucial in supporting the market.
If the MBA proposal draws inspiration from HMBS 2.0, it could signify a positive step for the forward mortgage industry in addressing liquidity challenges and enhancing market stability.
Related