Elevate your business and achieve your boldest goals at Inman On Tour: Nashville! Join industry leaders and top speakers for insights, strategies, and connections in Music City. Register now.
Recently, President Trump’s administration made headlines with an executive order to freeze federal grants and offered federal workers the option to resign voluntarily with eight months’ pay to reduce the government’s size.
These actions caused concern across the country, particularly in the already struggling housing market, affecting the pursuit of safe, affordable, and equitable housing for many Americans.
U.S. District Judge Loren L. AliKhan intervened, prompting the administration to rescind the order within 24 hours as federal unions addressed the mass severance offer.
(Editor’s note: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt clarified that the Wednesday memo rescinded the initial memo, not the freeze. The status of the freeze remains uncertain pending further developments.)
While it’s common for new administrations to review federal spending, the broad and vague nature of this review sets it apart, potentially jeopardizing essential funds that support households’ basic needs.
The article explores how these orders could impact the economy, housing market, and safety of many households.
Impact on Non-Profit Organizations
Non-profit organizations that rely on grant funding to provide crucial services face uncertainty about future funding. These organizations serve various needs, such as education, food programs, shelter services, and more, for marginalized individuals.
Diane Yentel, President and CEO of the National Council of Nonprofits, highlighted the importance of federal funding for these organizations and expressed relief at the memo’s rescission but acknowledged ongoing uncertainty.
Adrienne Goolsby, Senior Vice President for U.S. and Canada at Habitat for Humanity International, emphasized the potential impact on housing programs and urged chapters to prepare for operating without guaranteed grant reimbursements.
Federal Job Elimination
The administration’s offer for federal workers to resign could lead to a significant number of job losses, affecting local economies that rely on federal workers’ income. The potential elimination of certain departments, such as FEMA, adds to the uncertainty.
When FEMA job sites are established in small rural communities, it can have long-lasting effects on the local households that rely on these employment opportunities. This is particularly significant for communities where many residents work at these sites, as they play a crucial role in boosting the economic well-being of the area.
In the realm of finance and real estate, federal employees have traditionally been considered ideal candidates for mortgages. Their stable income, reliable work history, and above-average wages make them attractive prospects for lenders. As remote workers begin to return to office settings, there will likely be an influx of housing inventory in the market. However, this shift may also exacerbate the already strained housing market in major cities, further marginalizing middle-class and low-income individuals seeking affordable housing.
During the pandemic, small communities, known as “Zoom Towns,” experienced a surge in population as remote workers sought refuge from metropolitan areas. Conversely, urban centers faced challenges as the lunch crowd dwindled. This trend has implications for essential workers, such as those in grocery stores and gas stations, who may struggle with commuting or finding affordable housing near their workplaces.
The high cost of living played a significant role in the 2024 election outcomes, and with ongoing changes and uncertain economic policies, many Americans continue to face financial stress and mental health challenges. The country’s ranking in the World Happiness Report has declined, reflecting the struggles that citizens face in terms of health, happiness, and prosperity.
The pursuit of homeownership, often considered a quintessential American dream, is at risk as equity, opportunity, and support systems are threatened. Past experiences, such as the Great Recession, serve as a reminder of the financial instability that can occur when federal jobs are cut or economic crises arise.
As the current administration proposes significant job cuts, there are concerns about the impact on the real estate market, labor force, and social fabric of the nation. The delicate balance between these factors underscores the need for policies that support all segments of society, not just the most affluent.
As advocates for real estate professionals and consumers, organizations like the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and its Political Action Committee (RPAC) must prioritize advocating for homeownership and equitable housing policies. Their influence and resources can play a crucial role in shaping a more sustainable and inclusive housing market.
In conclusion, the intertwined nature of real estate, labor markets, and social issues underscores the importance of proactive advocacy and policy interventions to safeguard the well-being of communities and individuals across the United States. The challenges ahead require a comprehensive and collaborative approach to ensure that all Americans have the opportunity to achieve stability, happiness, and prosperity in their lives. sentence: “The cat is sleeping on the bed.”
The bed is being slept on by the cat.